The Sphinx With A Secret

cat

Amazing profession, teaching; great profession too. Hiring for job positions would probably allude its energizing working environment, great opportunities for personal development, with challenging, diverse, and interactive tasks to handle; not ever a dull moment. And in smaller font: moderate till low salary offer, highly demanding and principled performance requirements, heavy administrative work load, poor support structure, and from time to time suddenly changing policy conditions. Amazing, one might say, that teaching remains attractive considering its job features; and great that applicants keep going for it. Is there a secret, a hidden treasure in teaching may be? It still needs to be discovered, despite the substantial amount of studies we have on the nature of the teaching profession and characteristics of being a teacher (1). From them we learn about the devoted character, the caring nature, the constraint position, and the hard work that constitutes the job. Still it is a bit of a mystery what makes teachers love their work, despite all that is researched, studied, or analyzed.

An example of such a closer look is a recent study in which teachers were examined on implementation of constructivist instructional strategies into their teaching. Such a study could reveal something about what moves teachers to go for an approach and why they adopt a method to work with in their classroom. The study was of a questionnaire type, with quite a lot of respondents (about 250). It is of interest to have a look at the method of the study first: administration was management approved, and teachers had to fill in the lengthy item list during their lunch break time. Almost all item scores varied little around the central scale mean (3.5); when items refered to their own work the scale mean rises to 4. (a question pops to mind: shouldn’t we abandon survey questionnaire all together?)(2).

Anyway; some findings stand out. Teachers approved the new instructional approach; they indicated they would like to try it; they already used parts of the approach in their teaching, and they like to learn more. One notable critical exception: according to teachers their local needs in curriculum change are hardly taken into consideration. Nothing new so far. What about the secret then. What stands out in the teachers’ responses is the high overall concern with their students’ learning. No matter what conditions, methods, or change it revolves to them all around a real concern for their students. The secret being: “what is good for my students, is good enough for me”. In that sense it is reassuring that we have questionnaires that speak the teacher’s voice.

Source
Teachers’ perceptions of constructivist curriculum change as a predictor of their perceptions of the implementation of constructivist teaching–learning activities by Ali Yildirim & Koray Kasapoglu
Asia Pacific Education Review (2015) 16:565–577;
DOI 10.1007/s12564-015-9394-5, Copyright Springer, Crossmark

Untitled-1

Referencing
1. http://ssol.tki.org.nz/Social-studies-Years-1-10/Teaching-and-learning/effective_teaching_in_social_studies/teaching_strategies
2. http://work.chron.com/disadvantages-questionnaires-15870.html

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s